| 作成者 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 本文言語 |
|
| 出版者 |
|
| 発行日 |
|
| 収録物名 |
|
| 収録物名 |
|
| 巻 |
|
| 開始ページ |
|
| 終了ページ |
|
| 出版タイプ |
|
| アクセス権 |
|
| 関連DOI |
|
|
|
| 関連URI |
|
|
|
| 関連情報 |
|
|
|
| 概要 |
Recently, a receipt-free scheme is rising for a secure eauction. The goal of a receipt-free scheme in an eauction is to prevent a bid-rigging. If the bid-rigging happens in the e-auction, the winner c...an get the bidding item with an unreasonably low price. The first receipt-free scheme for the e-auction was proposed by Abe and Suzuki. Chen, Lee and Kim also proposed the extended receipt-free scheme. In this paper, we point out that the proposed receipt-free schemes do not prevent perfectly the bid-rigging attack. Moreover, we indicate that a bid-collision is a possible cause of an eauction. In the strict sense, the bid-collusion is different from the bid-rigging. In this paper, we do not present the scheme which can prevent the bid-collision attack. We compare the bid-rigging attack with the bid-collusion attack, and analyze the security of the existed receipt-free schemes in a viewpoint of the bidrigging attack and the bid-collusion attack.続きを見る
|
Mendeley出力
