Export Mendeley
＜conference paper＞
Comparison of Mapping Methods to Visualize the EC Landscape
| Creator | |
|---|---|
| Language | |
| Publisher | |
| Date | |
| Source Title | |
| First Page | |
| Last Page | |
| Conference | |
| Publication Type | |
| Access Rights | |
| Related DOI | |
| Abstract | We compare four mapping methods -self-organizing map (SOM), Sammon's non-linear mapping (NLM), topology preserving mapping of sample sets (TOPAS), and VISOR algorithm -to visualize the landscape of ev...olutionary computation (EC) and accelerate the convergence of EC and interactive EC (IEC). Three experiments are conducted using five benchmark functions and 28 subjects. We compare the computational complexity, the capacity for human visualization, and the effect on convergence for each experiment. These experiments showed that SOM demonstrated the best performance, and the VISOR performed well when CPU time was critical. The other mapping methods, NLM and TOPAS, were far from practical.show more |
| Table of Contents | 1 Introduction 2 Mapping Algorithms 3 Visualized GA as an Experimental System 4 Experimental Comparison of Mapping Methods 5 Conclusion |
Hide fulltext details.
| File | FileType | Size | Views | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IntConf070
|
1.83 MB | 113 |
Details
| NCID | |
|---|---|
| Record ID | |
| Related ISBN | |
| Created Date | 2021.08.27 |
| Modified Date | 2021.08.27 |