| 作成者 |
|
| 本文言語 |
|
| 出版者 |
|
|
|
| 発行日 |
|
| 収録物名 |
|
| 巻 |
|
| 開始ページ |
|
| 終了ページ |
|
| 出版タイプ |
|
| アクセス権 |
|
| JaLC DOI |
|
| 概要 |
So far we have had two or three different ways of interpretation of the rendaku-phenomenon in old Japanese, e.g. yama-gafa＜yama-kafa. 1) The theory that it was brought into being by the vocalization d...ue to phonetic context. 2) The theory that its vocalization was caused by the intervening word as nö or ni contracted and then elided, e.g. yama-gafa＜yama-kafa＜yama-nö-kafa. 3) The theory that it was the trace of voiced ccnsonants which had been capable of coming initial in words before Nara Period. Every one of these theories does not seem qualified to be the irrefutable interpretation of the rendakuphenomenon, but only a suggestion that it may be so. Taking all in all rendaku occurrences, we have discovered the following.Jfacts: a) Some words always cause rendaku in their compounds. b) Some words cause no rendaku in their compounds, e.g.ki.kuni.shiwo.shima. Some words which belong to the b group cause rendaku in the reduplication of the same word, meaning' many kuni (countries)', not' one kuni and another.' Hence the conclusion that the rendaku phenomenon in Nara Period was not only phonological but more or less semantic.続きを見る
|
Mendeley出力
