Mendeley出力
＜紀要論文＞
分析的手法による決断概念の枠組み
| 作成者 | |
|---|---|
| 本文言語 | |
| 出版者 | |
| 発行日 | |
| 収録物名 | |
| 巻 | |
| 開始ページ | |
| 終了ページ | |
| 出版タイプ | |
| アクセス権 | |
| JaLC DOI | |
| 概要 | Institute of Decision Science for a Sustainable Society (IDS3) researches the methodology of decision making in uncertain situation. IDS3 offers various practices and experiences of problem solving. P...articular instances of decisions are accumulated. However, the concept of decision that Decision Science focuses on is still undefined. Here I show that conditions of decision are (1) that it is made in uncertain situation, (2) that the agent exist, and (3) that it is socially justifiable. IDS3 has two models of the process of decision making, Y-model and G-model. Y-model claims (Y1) that decision that Decision Science focuses on is decision-making for big social issues and (Y2) that it cannot be selected by preferences. G-model claims (G1) that decision is subclass of determination and (G2) that we have autonomy and responsibility for what we decide. In this paper, I analyze the concept of "decision" in order to find the logical properties of decision. I concluded that combined model is valid framework of decisions and we can categorize four kinds of decisions according to the kinds of uncertainty of situations. My conclusion demonstrates that as well as how we categorize various kinds of decisions, the social justifications of particular decisions are dynamics for a course of problem solving.続きを見る |
| 目次 | はじめに 1. 概念分析を通じた「決断」の特徴づけ 1-1. 概念分析とはどのような手法か 1-2. 矢原モデルと統治モデル 1-3.「決断」の概念分析 1-4. 矢原モデルと統治モデルの検証 2. 決断の分類 2-1.「答えが不確実な状況」の五つの分類 2-2. 現実的に最善の答えに到達できない状況 2-3. どれが最善の答えか原理的に決められない状況 2-4. 最善の答えが複数存在する状況 3. 結論 4. おわりに続きを見る |
詳細
| PISSN | |
|---|---|
| EISSN | |
| レコードID | |
| 主題 | |
| 登録日 | 2019.05.23 |
| 更新日 | 2021.03.23 |