| 作成者 |
|
| 本文言語 |
|
| 出版者 |
|
|
|
| 発行日 |
|
| 収録物名 |
|
| 巻 |
|
| 開始ページ |
|
| 終了ページ |
|
| 出版タイプ |
|
| アクセス権 |
|
| JaLC DOI |
|
| 関連DOI |
|
|
|
|
|
| 関連URI |
|
|
|
|
|
| 関連情報 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 概要 |
Although the Japanese “naika-” and the Chinese “bu …ma” question formats belong to the same grammatical category, accompanied by words which show a denial meaning, there still remain some differences ...between the two languages. In functions or formats, for example, the negative predicate “naika-” does not correspond with the Chinese exactly. In Japanese, the phrase is represented in the form of a question statement denying the lobbying statement, whereas the Chinese may be implemented using a normative question. The Chinese, “bu …ma,” is used as an ironic statement. It is possible to emphasize the tone and in some cases, it could have “demand, rebuke, or condemnation” nuances.続きを見る
|
Mendeley出力
