| 作成者 |
|
|
|
| 本文言語 |
|
| 出版者 |
|
|
|
| 発行日 |
|
| 収録物名 |
|
| 巻 |
|
| 開始ページ |
|
| 終了ページ |
|
| 出版タイプ |
|
| アクセス権 |
|
| JaLC DOI |
|
| 関連DOI |
|
|
|
|
|
| 関連URI |
|
|
|
|
|
| 関連情報 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 概要 |
The present article focuses on a persistent bias observed in evaluating graduation theses and oral presentations. Inspections on score distributions marked by chairs and deputy-chairs revealed that th...e same person exhibited opposite directions of bias, depending on the role given to the person: chairs generally scored higher than deputy-chairs, with a smaller variance. This tendency has been confirmed with observations from the recent two years of practice. Thus, it is fair to employ both chairs and deputy-chairs in the evaluation, despite the effort staffs have to pay. Moreover, this built-in antagonistic system also activated scientific discussions at oral presentations, which actually gave favorable impression to same attending students.続きを見る
|
Mendeley出力
