| 作成者 |
|
|
|
| 本文言語 |
|
| 出版者 |
|
| 発行日 |
|
| 収録物名 |
|
| 巻 |
|
| 開始ページ |
|
| 終了ページ |
|
| 出版タイプ |
|
| アクセス権 |
|
| JaLC DOI |
|
| 関連DOI |
|
|
|
|
|
| 関連URI |
|
|
|
|
|
| 関連情報 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 概要 |
The present report focuses on how roles of faculty members bias scoring of graduation theses and oral presentations. There were three categories of roles: (1)a Chair, (2)deputy chairs, and(3)the rest ...of the faculty. An advisor of a student was obligately appointed as a chair. Two deputy chairs were selected on the basis of similarity to the advisor in their specialities. The chair and deputy chairs assessed both a graduation thesis and an oral presentation of the student, whereas the rest of the faculty only assessed the oral presentation. The chair also took into consideration the student’s general research activity. Chairs, i.e. advisors, tended to score higher than deputy chairs. The distribution of the scores given by deputy chairs showed the largest standard deviation, suggesting that the same person acting as a deputy chair tended to score with a sharper contrast for the quality of research than when he or she was acting as a chair. Thus, a group of a chair and deputy chairs can work in effect a kind of an antagonistic system that cancels out the biases inevitably caused by the roles of a chair and a deputy chair. These biases should be taken into account if we would propose a more preferable marking system of graduation theses and oral presentations.続きを見る
|
Mendeley出力
