| 概要 |
This paper reports on the use of Japanese “unmarked” potential expressions by Chinese learners of Japanese from three perspectives : learning environment, learning history and Japanese proficiency. Th...e following conclusions were drawn. First, the usage tendency of learners in a second language environment is closer to that of a Japanese native speaker than learners in a foreign language environment. Second, while Japanese native speakers frequently use “unmarked” potential expressions in non-volitional intransitive verbs, it is clear that Chinese learners often use marked potential expressions for Type 7 （result-potential expression） non-volitional intransitive verbs. Third, the form “non-volitional intransitive verb + marked potential expressions” found in words such as “de-rare-（nai）（出られ（ない））” tends to be used by Chinese learners, even though Japanese native speakers don’ t employ it at all. This paper also investigates the use of “unmarked” potential expressions with regards to the “Japanese learning history” and “Japanese proficiency” of Chinese learners of Japanese in a foreign language environment. As the amount of time spent studying Japanese increases and language proficiency improves, the rate of using “unmarked” potential expressions increase for some non-volitional intransitive verbs, such as Type 5（natural phenomenon） and Type 8（perceive ability）. Conversely, the same pattern were not evident for non-volitional intransitive verbs such as Type 6（human condition） and Type 7（result-potential expression）. There are also cases of regression in the use of “unmarked” potential expressions for some learner groups, such as people who have 3 years of language learning experience, as well as those studying who have acquired mid-level linguistic ability（N2）.続きを見る
|
Mendeley出力
