| 作成者 |
|
| 本文言語 |
|
| 出版者 |
|
|
|
| 発行日 |
|
| 収録物名 |
|
| 巻 |
|
| 開始ページ |
|
| 終了ページ |
|
| 出版タイプ |
|
| アクセス権 |
|
| JaLC DOI |
|
| 概要 |
As Klopf & Kuramots (2003) observe, intercultural negotiation is a fact of life-in business, politics, almost all facets of ordinary living. This increase in intercultural interation naturally leads t...o misunderstandings and intepersonal conflicts. The first step to develop effective solutions to these problems would be to clarify the differences of patterns of behaviors between different cultures. The goal of this article is to explore the question whether strategies Japanese choose in resolving the interpersonal conflict differ from those native speakers of English do in some similar situations. If there are some differences between them, how they are diffeeent in what situations is also exmined. Some similarities and differences were found in open role-playings where 16 subjects in English and 15 in Japanese participated in 12 kinds of situation. They were instructed to refuse a person close to them like a friend or a boss without offending him/her. The differences were analyzed and explained by the concept of 'amae', which Doi (1941) found as a typical character of Japanese.続きを見る
|
Mendeley出力
slc019p001