| 作成者 |
|
|
|
| 本文言語 |
|
| 出版者 |
|
|
|
| 発行日 |
|
| 収録物名 |
|
| 巻 |
|
| 開始ページ |
|
| 終了ページ |
|
| 出版タイプ |
|
| アクセス権 |
|
| JaLC DOI |
|
| 関連DOI |
|
|
|
| 関連URI |
|
|
|
| 関連情報 |
|
|
|
| 概要 |
This study investigated the effects of imagery experiences on false memory. Results didn't indicate the effects of using imagery recognized in previous studies, nor the distinction between observing v...iewpoint and experiencing (acting) viewpoint imagery instruction. It is necessary to examine the validity of stimulus, and the manipulation of manner of imaging (this study investigated the viewpoint) cost high cognitive loads. Otherwise, the effect of individual differences of imagery experiences was suggested: the less frequent daily-image activities, the more confused conviction of past events. “Source monitoring theory (Johnson, Hashtroud, & Lindsay, 1993)”, a theory about false memory creation, couldn't explain this. But theory about manner of imagery experience (Tajima, 1987; 1996) can. That is, a person oriented internal experiences is more sensitive to distinguishing internal representation (e.g.: memory, and imagery) because of his sensitiveness. It is necessary to examine the reliability more, but this study would show the importance of the theory of imagery experiences.続きを見る
|
Mendeley出力
KJ00000700616-00001