| 作成者 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 本文言語 |
|
| 出版者 |
|
|
|
| 発行日 |
|
| 収録物名 |
|
| 巻 |
|
| 開始ページ |
|
| 終了ページ |
|
| 会議情報 |
|
| 出版タイプ |
|
| アクセス権 |
|
| Crossref DOI |
|
| 権利関係 |
|
| 権利関係 |
|
| 概要 |
In this investigation, two varieties of locally produced composite particleboard were investigated. The first kind consists of a mixture of glue, coconut fiber, periwinkle shell, and rice husk. The se...cond kind is an adhesive-sawdust-snail-shell-coconut-fibre mixture. Innovative composite particleboard samples were produced using urea-formaldehyde as an adhesive resin throughout ten (10) runs. The particleboard's moisture content, density, compressive strength, tensile strength, rupture modulus, and elasticity were all assessed. Utilizing the response surface approach, the proportionate mix ratio of the samples (Run 1 to 10) was calculated to choose the samples that best met ASTM and EN (Eurocodes) standards. The study demonstrated that Type A specimens have a more workable outcome than Type B specimens. To meet the specified standard requirements for particleboard production, manual methods must be upgraded or investigated by employing a mechanical approach.続きを見る
|
Mendeley出力
