Mendeley出力
＜紀要論文＞
ヤエル・タミールの「複数ネイション主義」構想の批判的検討 : 「リベラリズムの中立性原理」との関係性を中心に
| 作成者 | |
|---|---|
| 本文言語 | |
| 出版者 | |
| 発行日 | |
| 収録物名 | |
| 巻 | |
| 開始ページ | |
| 終了ページ | |
| 出版タイプ | |
| アクセス権 | |
| JaLC DOI | |
| 概要 | The purpose of this paper is to criticize Yael Tamir's "multinationalism", especially the contradiction between her theoretical background and her concept of international order. Although Tamir is def...initely skeptical of liberal principle of neutrality on the nation states level as other liberal nationalists do, on the level of regional arrangements, she tacitly recognizes it. In short, her argument is self-contradictory on this point. The reason why she falls into this illogical conclusion is her absence of critical consideration about the concept of "region." According to some constructivists, a region is socially constructed on common ethno-cultural values (religions, languages and etc.) so is a nation. In other words, a region is the cognitive (imagined) one. If so, the regional organization like EU cannot be purely culturally neutral. It means that not only the nation state level, but also the regional arrangements level, socio-political institution is closely related to ethno-cultural elements as liberal nationalists clearly insist. If Tamir wants to assert that national self-determination might best be attained within a larger regional framework, she should show us the positive proof of it. Her multinationalism is theoretically fragile due to lack of the evidence.続きを見る |
| 目次 | 序 一 リベラリズムの政治理論の発展とリベラル・ナショナリズム論の登場 二 ヤエル・タミールの複数ネイション主義構想 三 批判的考察 （一）リベラリズムの中立性原理と地域機構 （二）社会的構築物としての地域 （三）地域機構における政治と文化の峻別の不可能性 （四）総括 結語 |
詳細
| NCID | |
|---|---|
| レコードID | |
| 主題 | |
| タイプ | |
| 登録日 | 2021.10.14 |
| 更新日 | 2021.12.13 |