作成者 |
|
本文言語 |
|
出版者 |
|
|
発行日 |
|
収録物名 |
|
巻 |
|
開始ページ |
|
終了ページ |
|
出版タイプ |
|
アクセス権 |
|
JaLC DOI |
|
関連DOI |
|
|
|
関連URI |
|
|
|
関連情報 |
|
|
|
概要 |
The article proposes that the superiority phenomenon and its disappearance can be deduced from the Least Effort and the Phase theory. In this approach, a superiority effect is a result of a competitio...n among potentially possible derivations. The superiority is determined based on the estimated cost of each movement, not the structural closeness of the two wh-words. Furthermore, assuming that the derivations in the competition are evaluated at the end of every phase, the wh-word in the upper phase is superior to the one in the lower phase unless the latter has moved up to the upper phase beforehand. Conversely, if the multiple wh-words occur in a common phase and the cost of each derivation is equivalent, the superiority effect will disappear. In order to confirm this prediction, I examine the contrast of the superiority effect observed in English and German. I also discuss the superiority effect and its disappearance in definite clauses in which a weak pronoun moves to the front of vP (Müller (2004)'s Wackernagel Movement) and in indefinite clauses of which the clause type is coherent (Grewendorf & Sternfeld (1990)). I show that even in German, where disappearance of the superiority effect is extensively observed, the effect is preserved in these syntactic environments.続きを見る
|
目次 |
0.初めに 1.フェイズと優位効果 2.ドイツ語の優位効果 3.ドイツ語に於けるスクランブリングと優位効果 4.節の定形性と優位効果 5.'incoherent'な非定形節に隔てられた二重疑問詞が示す優位性 6.優位現象とWackernagel Movement 7.結語
|