| Creator |
|
|
|
| Language |
|
| Publisher |
|
|
|
| Date |
|
| Source Title |
|
| Vol |
|
| First Page |
|
| Last Page |
|
| Publication Type |
|
| Access Rights |
|
| JaLC DOI |
|
| Related DOI |
|
|
|
|
|
| Related URI |
|
|
|
|
|
| Relation |
|
|
|
|
|
| Abstract |
The present article focuses on a persistent bias observed in evaluating graduation theses and oral presentations. Inspections on score distributions marked by chairs and deputy-chairs revealed that th...e same person exhibited opposite directions of bias, depending on the role given to the person: chairs generally scored higher than deputy-chairs, with a smaller variance. This tendency has been confirmed with observations from the recent two years of practice. Thus, it is fair to employ both chairs and deputy-chairs in the evaluation, despite the effort staffs have to pay. Moreover, this built-in antagonistic system also activated scientific discussions at oral presentations, which actually gave favorable impression to same attending students.show more
|
Export Mendeley
p033