| Creator |
|
| Language |
|
| Publisher |
|
|
|
| Date |
|
| Source Title |
|
| Vol |
|
| First Page |
|
| Last Page |
|
| Publication Type |
|
| Access Rights |
|
| JaLC DOI |
|
| Related DOI |
|
|
|
| Related URI |
|
|
|
| Relation |
|
|
|
| Abstract |
A comparison of Dong In's and Tanizaki's works reveals that they have many common features. Tanizaki devoted himself to beauty. He is the author of aestheticism, who pursued only beauty. While Tanizak...i represents beauty in a unique world apart from the real world, Dong In expresses it in a fiercer manner. The worlds in Dong In's works are destined to end tragically and the author makes his persons destroy social customs and morals for art's sake.show more
|
| Table of Contents |
はじめに 第一章 東仁が来日した背景と文学活動の開始 第二章 「刺青」と「狂炎ソナタ」の美意識をめぐって 第一節 東仁の谷崎に対する言及 第二節 「刺青」と「狂炎ソナタ」における美の考察 ア）「刺青」における美意識 イ）「狂炎ソナタ」における美意識 結論
|
Export Mendeley
KJ00005483980