| Creator |
|
| Language |
|
| Publisher |
|
|
|
| Date |
|
| Source Title |
|
| Vol |
|
| Issue |
|
| First Page |
|
| Last Page |
|
| Publication Type |
|
| Access Rights |
|
| JaLC DOI |
|
| Related DOI |
|
|
|
|
|
| Related URI |
|
|
|
|
|
| Relation |
|
|
|
|
|
| Table of Contents |
1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE FEATURES OF THE JAPANESE LEMENCY PROGRAM 3. EVALUATING LENIENCY PROGRAMS 3.1. A Game of Strategic Rational Behavior 3.2. Information in Function of a Leniency Program 4. LENIENCY FOR THE PRE-AND POST-INVESTIGATION STAGE 4.1. Few Lessons from Practice 4.2. Leniency beyond the Pre-Investigation Stage in Japan 5. IMMUNITY As AN INCENTIVE 5.1. Immunity, only for the Pre-investigation Stage? 5.2. Japan Thrifty with Immunity 6. A RACE TO THE COURTHOUSE DOOR 6.1. Limiting Leniency to the First Applicant? 6.2. A Race to Kasumigaseki? 7. THE ABSENCE OF DISCRETIONARY POWERS 7.1. Immunity or Not, That is the Question 7.2. Immunity or Reduction, That is the Question 7.3. Discretion or Not, That is the Question in Japan 8. CLEAR CONDITIONS FOR QUALIFICATION 8.1. A Forgotten Aspect of Leniency Programs 8.2. 0verview of Conditions 8.3. Problematic Conditions 8.4. Short and Clear Conditions in Japan 9. CONCLUSION
|
Export Mendeley
hosei75-3_pa001