| 作成者 |
|
|
|
| 本文言語 |
|
| 出版者 |
|
| 発行日 |
|
| 収録物名 |
|
| 巻 |
|
| 開始ページ |
|
| 終了ページ |
|
| 会議情報 |
|
| 出版タイプ |
|
| アクセス権 |
|
| Crossref DOI |
|
| 権利関係 |
|
| 権利関係 |
|
| 概要 |
XGBoost is widely used in performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) because of its excellent performance, scalability, efficiency and ability to capture complex patterns. However, it often lack...s interpretability, which makes it harder to trust, especially when classifying the seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings into Immediate Occupancy (IO), Life Safety (LS), and Collapse Prevention (CP). This issue becomes more difficult when the CP class is underrepresented. This study examines how three resampling methods: ADASYN (oversampling), EditedNN (undersampling), and SMOTE-Tomek (hybrid) affect how well we can understand XGBoost predictions. SHAP and Partial Dependence Plots (PDPs) are used to explain which features the model focuses on. Results show that oversampling reveals more influential and important features beyond Sa(1.0), such as We, SR, Eh, and Sa(T1), improving model transparency. Careful resampling, therefore, is critical. It is essential for interpretable and trustworthy models in PBEE.続きを見る
|