| 作成者 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 本文言語 |
|
| 出版者 |
|
| 発行日 |
|
| 開始ページ |
|
| 終了ページ |
|
| 会議情報 |
|
| アクセス権 |
|
| 権利関係 |
|
|
|
| 関連DOI |
|
| 関連DOI |
|
| 関連URI |
|
| 関連情報 |
|
| 概要 |
We developed evaluation criteria for engineer training for international remote medical education with the Asia-Pacific Advanced Network Medical Working Group. A four-level analytic rubric was created... for each objective of a previously developed training program. Level 1 was the lowest (incapable) and level 4 the highest (highly capable). We set level 3 (capable) as the attainment target for the training program. We applied the Delphi method for consensus building. The average response rate was 92% (first survey, 16/18; second survey, 17/18). Overall, appropriate consensus was achieved with all the objective items. The evaluation criteria were created following agreement among 17 evaluators from 13 countries and territories. In future research, it will be necessary to evaluate our criteria when assessing participants' achievement levels in actual training.続きを見る
|
Mendeley出力
