| 作成者 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 本文言語 |
|
| 出版者 |
|
|
|
| 発行日 |
|
| 収録物名 |
|
| 巻 |
|
| 開始ページ |
|
| 終了ページ |
|
| 出版タイプ |
|
| アクセス権 |
|
| JaLC DOI |
|
| 概要 |
The purpose of this study was to explore how the peer evaluation influenced the types of revision changes made in English as Foreign Language (EFL) writing. Participants consisted of 47 first-year stu...dents who took an EFL writing course at a national university in Japan. The students'English proficiency was at an intermediate level on average. They were asked to write an essay and to revise it after it was evaluated by three of them. They exchanged their first drafts with peers to evaluate each essay with one of two different categories of evaluation items; Category A focused on meaning aspects, and Category B on surface aspects. Their first and revised drafts and the filled evaluation sheets were collected. Each revision made by the students was classified as either a surface change or a meaning change. The majority of revisions were surface changes, regardless of the evaluation category; but 30・40% of the changes were meaning changes, which brought new information to or discarded some information from the texts. It seems that the evaluation category did not influence the type of revisions the students made.続きを見る
|
Mendeley出力
