| 作成者 |
|
| 本文言語 |
|
| 出版者 |
|
|
|
| 発行日 |
|
| 収録物名 |
|
| 巻 |
|
| 開始ページ |
|
| 終了ページ |
|
| 出版タイプ |
|
| アクセス権 |
|
| JaLC DOI |
|
| 権利関係 |
|
|
|
| 概要 |
Although the active voice has gradually secured its place in scientific writing, there has been no systematic research to assess the current status of its use across disciplines. Therefore, this paper... examined the discipline dependency for the use of the active/passive voice in scientific writing in 22 influential journals from science-related disciplines. The analysis revealed that 72% either strongly recommended or preferred the use of the active voice, whereas only 0.3% instructed to solely use the passive voice. The study also revealed that such preferences depended on the academic disciplines and the views of the publishers.続きを見る
|
Mendeley出力
