| 作成者 |
|
| 本文言語 |
|
| 出版者 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 発行日 |
|
| 収録物名 |
|
| 開始ページ |
|
| 終了ページ |
|
| 出版タイプ |
|
| アクセス権 |
|
| 関連DOI |
|
| 関連DOI |
|
| 関連DOI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 関連URI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 関連URI |
|
| 関連HDL |
|
| 関連ISBN |
|
| 関連HDL |
|
| 関連情報 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 概要 |
Historical research on nationalism in Japan has shown how different concepts of an integrative political state and a genealogical ethnic nation competed since the Meiji period. Initially, concepts of ...cultural and ethnic nationalism served for populist attacks against the political state in modern Japan; by the 1920s, however, they were also utilized by the state to serve functions of identification with and justification of imperial Japan. In this paper, I examine women's discourses on motherhood and family and analyze how some feminists since the Taisho^- period have directed their demands towards the Japanese political state (as a welfare state) and how others expounded anti-statist views and claimed the ethno-cultural nation as the backup for their feminist agenda. In 1930s and 1940s Japan, the convolution of ethnonational rhetoric with welfare state's gendered politics and the partial integration of women into political offices were two important strategic elements that explain the subsequent cooptation of different groups of feminists by the wartime government.続きを見る
|
| 目次 |
1. EINFÜHRUNG: NATION UND GESCHLECHT 2. STAAT UND NATION 3. FEMINISMUS, STAAT UND NATION IN DER VORKRIEGSZEIT 4. FEMINISMUS UND DER NATIONALSTAAT IN DER KRIEGSZEIT 5. DIE GROSSJAPANISCHE FRAUENVEREINIGUNG(DAI NIPPON FUJINKAI) 6. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN
|
Mendeley出力
JS19_Germer