| 作成者 |
|
| 本文言語 |
|
| 出版者 |
|
|
|
| 発行日 |
|
| 収録物名 |
|
| 巻 |
|
| 号 |
|
| 開始ページ |
|
| 終了ページ |
|
| 出版タイプ |
|
| アクセス権 |
|
| JaLC DOI |
|
| 概要 |
The “doctrine of endurance obligation” (the endurance doctrine) states, “all members of the nation are obligated to equally accept and endure some loss as a result of war. Whether you lost life, suffe...red bodily injury, or lost assets, you ought to endure it in such a state of national emergency and the state has no legal obligation to redress war-related loss.” This doctrine has been cited numerous times in court cases to deny plaintiff’s claim for state compensation for war-related loss. This paper attempts to draws out the logic of this little known doctrine by tracing historical processes through which the doctrine took shape and how it has put in effect in legal cases, by examining primary documents, such as briefs and other documents in related court cases and the minutes of the “committee to discuss compensation for oversea assets,” and secondary documents including newspapers and newsletters of war-victims’ groups. Moreover, by extending the scope of analysis beyond legal cases, it places the doctrine in a larger social and political context of war redress measures and controversy over war responsibility. It will lead us, in the end, to ponder upon theoretical questions of who bears war responsibility in the total war and how much such responsibility ought to be borne by individual national subject and by the state.続きを見る
|
| 目次 |
第１節 はじめに 第２節 受忍論の展開 司法判断を中心に 第３節 先行研究と本稿の位置づけ 第４節 受忍論の始まり 在外財産補償問題 第５節 在外財産補償請求事件 受忍論のリーディング・ケース 第６節 拡大する格差 「犠牲の平等」をめぐって 第７節 司法判断の政治的効力 第８節 受忍論と国家 結びにかえて
|
Mendeley出力
