Mendeley出力
＜図書＞
Progress in international relations theory : appraising the field
| 責任表示 | Colin Elman and Miriam Fendius Elman, editors |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | BCSIA studies in international security |
| データ種別 | 図書 |
| 出版情報 | Cambridge : MIT Press , c2003 |
| 本文言語 | 英語 |
| 大きさ | xiv, 503 p. ; 24 cm |
| 概要 | All academic disciplines periodically appraise their effectiveness, evaluating the progress of previous scholarship and judging which approaches are useful and which are not. Although no field could s...rvive if it did nothing but appraise its progress, occasional appraisals are important and if done well can help advance the field. This book investigates how international relations theorists can better equip themselves to determine the state of scholarly work in their field. It takes as its starting point Imre Lakatos's influential theory of scientific change, and in particular his methodology of scientific research programs (MSRP). It uses MSRP to organize its analysis of major research programs over the last several decades and uses MSRP's criteria for theoretical progress to evaluate these programs. The contributors appraise the progress of institutional theory, varieties of realist and liberal theory, operational code analysis, and other research programs in international relations. Their analyses reveal the strengths and limits of Lakatosian criteria and the need for metatheoretical metrics for evaluating scientific progress. All academic disciplines periodically appraise their effectiveness, evaluating the progress of previous scholarship and judging which approaches are useful and which are not. Although no field could survive if it did nothing but appraise its progress, occasional appraisals are important and if done well can help advance the field. This book investigates how international relations theorists can better equip themselves to determine the state of scholarly work in their field. It takes as its starting point Imre Lakatos's influential theory of scientific change, and in particular his methodology of scientific research programs (MSRP). It uses MSRP to organize its analysis of major research programs over the last several decades and uses MSRP's criteria for theoretical progress to evaluate these programs. The contributors appraise the progress of institutional theory, varieties of realist and liberal theory, operational code analysis, and other research programs in international relations. Their analyses reveal the strengths and limits of Lakatosian criteria and the need for metatheoretical metrics for evaluating scientific progress. 続きを見る |
所蔵情報
| 状態 | 巻次 | 所蔵場所 | 請求記号 | 刷年 | 文庫名称 | 資料番号 | コメント | 予約・取寄 | 複写申込 | 自動書庫 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
: pbk | 中央図 自動書庫 | 319/E 48 | 2003 |
|
058212009012032 |
|
書誌詳細
| 一般注記 | "Foreword by Kenneth N. Waltz"--Cover of pbk "Directly descended from the papers and the discussions at a conference on "Progress in International Relations Theory" ... in Scottsdale, Arizona, on January 15-16, 1999"--Acknowledgments Includes bibliographical references and index |
|---|---|
| 著者標目 | Elman, Colin Elman, Miriam Fendius |
| 件 名 | LCSH:International relations -- Methodology 全ての件名で検索 |
| 分 類 | LCC:JZ1242 DC21:327.1/01 |
| 書誌ID | 1001414578 |
| ISBN | 0262050684 |
| NCID | BA63598924 |
| 巻冊次 | : hc ; ISBN:0262050684 : pbk ; ISBN:0262550415 |
| 登録日 | 2010.02.22 |
| 更新日 | 2010.02.22 |