Mendeley出力
＜図書＞
Conservation reconsidered : nature, virtue, and American liberal democracy
| 責任表示 | edited by Charles T. Rubin |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | The political economy forum |
| データ種別 | 図書 |
| 出版情報 | Lanham, Md. : Rowman & Littlefield , c2000 |
| 本文言語 | 英語 |
| 大きさ | xix, 254 p. ; 23 cm |
| 概要 | Eight contributors, professors of political science and history, as well as organization men, write about Emerson, Thoreau, John Muir, Teddy Roosevelt, Gifford Pinchot, Aldo Leopold, and Frederick Law...Olmstead. The overall goal of this volume is to prove that many American ur-environmentalists were not simply conservationists--those intent on setting nature aside for wise and efficient use--nor simply preservationists--those anti-consumerists intent on setting nature aside for moral reasons--but both. Two essays show that preservationists Muir and Leopold were not just in favor of locking away as much wilderness as possible, but using it. Roosevelt, argues another essay, was no mere rational planner, but intensely interested in the moral role of wilderness for democracy. Still another essay holds that Pinchot less believed in science than used it to support a political reform program. Annotation copyrighted by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR Eight contributors, professors of political science and history, as well as organization men, write about Emerson, Thoreau, John Muir, Teddy Roosevelt, Gifford Pinchot, Aldo Leopold, and Frederick Law Olmstead. The overall goal of this volume is to prove that many American ur-environmentalists were not simply conservationists--those intent on setting nature aside for wise and efficient use--nor simply preservationists--those anti-consumerists intent on setting nature aside for moral reasons--but both. Two essays show that preservationists Muir and Leopold were not just in favor of locking away as much wilderness as possible, but using it. Roosevelt, argues another essay, was no mere rational planner, but intensely interested in the moral role of wilderness for democracy. Still another essay holds that Pinchot less believed in science than used it to support a political reform program. Annotation copyrighted by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR続きを見る |
所蔵情報
| 状態 | 巻次 | 所蔵場所 | 請求記号 | 刷年 | 文庫名称 | 資料番号 | コメント | 予約・取寄 | 複写申込 | 自動書庫 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
: pbk | 中央図 自動書庫 | 334.7/R 81 | 2000 |
|
052212000005218 |
|
書誌詳細
| 一般注記 | Includes bibliographical references and index |
|---|---|
| 著者標目 | Rubin, Charles T. |
| 件 名 | LCSH:Nature conservation -- United States -- History
全ての件名で検索
LCSH:Nature conservation -- United States -- Philosophy 全ての件名で検索 LCSH:Conservationists -- United States 全ての件名で検索 |
| 分 類 | LCC:QH76 DC21:333.7/2/0973 |
| 書誌ID | 1000900994 |
| ISBN | 0847697169 |
| NCID | BA48083645 |
| 巻冊次 | : cloth ; ISBN:0847697169 : pbk ; ISBN:0847697177 |
| 登録日 | 2009.09.15 |
| 更新日 | 2009.09.15 |