Mendeley出力
＜図書＞
Reconceiving decision-making in democratic politics : attention, choice, and public policy
| 責任表示 | Bryan D. Jones |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | American politics and political economy |
| データ種別 | 図書 |
| 出版情報 | Chicago : University of Chicago Press , c1994 |
| 本文言語 | 英語 |
| 大きさ | xii, 277 p. : ill. ; 24 cm |
| 概要 | Most models of political decision-making maintain that individual preferences remain relatively constant. Why, then, are there often sudden abrupt changes in public opinion on political issues? Or to...al reversals by politicians on specific issues? Bryan D. Jones answers these questions by innovatively connecting insights from cognitive science and rational choice theory to political life.Individuals and political systems alike, Jones argues, tend to be attentive to only one issue at a time. Using numerous examples from elections, public opinion polls, congressional deliberations, and of bureaucratic decision-making, he shows how shifting attentiveness can and does alter choices and political outcomes--even when underlying preferences remain relatively fixed. An individual, for example, may initially decide to vote for a candidate because of her stand on spending but change his vote when he learns of her position on abortion, never really balancing the two options. Most models of political decision-making maintain that individual preferences remain relatively constant. Why, then, are there often sudden abrupt changes in public opinion on political issues? Or total reversals by politicians on specific issues? Bryan D. Jones answers these questions by innovatively connecting insights from cognitive science and rational choice theory to political life.Individuals and political systems alike, Jones argues, tend to be attentive to only one issue at a time. Using numerous examples from elections, public opinion polls, congressional deliberations, and of bureaucratic decision-making, he shows how shifting attentiveness can and does alter choices and political outcomes--even when underlying preferences remain relatively fixed. An individual, for example, may initially decide to vote for a candidate because of her stand on spending but change his vote when he learns of her position on abortion, never really balancing the two options. 続きを見る |
所蔵情報
| 状態 | 巻次 | 所蔵場所 | 請求記号 | 刷年 | 文庫名称 | 資料番号 | コメント | 予約・取寄 | 複写申込 | 自動書庫 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
: cloth | 中央図 自動書庫 | 311.7/J 72/1 | 1994 |
|
017211997009068 |
|
書誌詳細
| 一般注記 | Includes bibliographical references and index |
|---|---|
| 著者標目 | *Jones, Bryan D. |
| 件 名 | LCSH:Political planning -- United States
全ての件名で検索
LCSH:Social choice -- United States 全ての件名で検索 LCSH:Democracy -- United States 全ての件名で検索 LCSH:United States -- Politics and government -- Decision making 全ての件名で検索 |
| 分 類 | LCC:JK468.P64 DC20:320/.01/9 |
| 書誌ID | 1000183683 |
| ISBN | 0226406504 |
| NCID | BA24174597 |
| 巻冊次 | : cloth ; ISBN:0226406504 : paper ; ISBN:0226406512 |
| 登録日 | 2009.09.11 |
| 更新日 | 2009.09.11 |