| 作成者 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 本文言語 |
|
| 出版者 |
|
|
|
| 発行日 |
|
| 収録物名 |
|
| 巻 |
|
| 開始ページ |
|
| 終了ページ |
|
| 出版タイプ |
|
| アクセス権 |
|
| 関連DOI |
|
|
|
| 関連URI |
|
|
|
| 関連情報 |
|
|
|
| 概要 |
In Japan, rabies had been eradicated in 1956 and Japan has been one of the rabies free countries since then. The success of rabies eradication depended heavily on the control measure, the Act of Rabie...s Prevention, which includes vaccination for dogs, registration of dogs, elimination of stray dogs and quarantine of animals. However, being free from rabies for a long time made Japanese public interest in prophylaxes weakened, and it is said that the number of registered dog is largely different from the actual number and that vaccination coverage is below 40%. Moreover, the risk of transmission of rabies in Japan might be different from the past because of the change of social situation such as relationship between dogs and humans, and urbanized environment. Under such circumstances, a study on the review of current rabies prevention measure in Japan was granted by the Japan Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfares. The purposes of our study are prediction of the rabies transmission dynamics in present situation, given the disease is introduced in Japan, and the assessment of cost and efficacy of different options of preventive measures.続きを見る
|
Mendeley出力
